Integrated assessment technique for the earth remote probing spacecraft rational parameters and development program

Aeronautical and Space-Rocket Engineering


DOI: 10.34759/vst-2021-4-62-77

Аuthors

Lamzin V. V.*, Lamzin V. A.**

Moscow Aviation Institute (National Research University), 4, Volokolamskoe shosse, Moscow, А-80, GSP-3, 125993, Russia

*e-mail: 8916846583@mail.ru
**e-mail: 8465836@mail.ru

Abstract

The article performs an integrated assessment of the Earth remote sensing (ERS) spacecraft (SC) rational parameters and development program in the period under consideration with account for technical-and-economic limitations. The problem of rational parameters assessment of the ERS space system (SS) modernization program is being solved. The problem specialty consists in the fact that the initial state was determined, namely the base object (ERS SC).

The authors proposed a technique for integrated assessment of a spacecraft rational parameters and development program, based on the multilevel design management multilevel project study models and statistical method of multilevel consistent optimization. This technique includes a stagewise solution of rational parameters integrated assessment of a spacecraft as a part of the ERS SC in the considered period. The first stage solves the problem of parameters assessment of the ERS SC modernization program. The second stage solves the problem of the spacecraft rational parameters assessment with account for design work solutions for its subsystems.

The article presents the developed algorithm for integrated assessment of the spacecraft rational parameters and development program, as well as basic relations of the project models. The design work analysis specialty of the spacecraft development program in the considered period is a complex nature of the research. A system rational structure is being determined herewith simultaneously with the subsystems (spacecraft modifications) project parameters, as well as the system modernization program, namely the date and terms of modernizations performing in the considered period. The dependencies reflecting the basic ERS SC characteristics (weight and cost) changing on the system technical characteristics were formed by both correlation and regression methods based on the posteriori (statistical) information of the ERS SC samples-prototypes characteristics. The article adduces the results of the various options of the modernization programs studying. The considered (being forecasted) time period is of twenty years. In contrast to the third one when only one modernization is being performed with four spacecraft modifications, the first and the second options comprise performing two modernizations. The difference between the first and the second options consists in the number of the spacecraft modifications. The first option contains four modifications while there are three of them in the second one. The performed quantitative esteems of the total reduced expenditures on the modernization program realization in the course of twenty years reveal that the second option, at which the expenditures are minimum and of 1.154 billion of conventional unit is rational. The cost saving is 12.5–30% compared to the first and third options of the modernization program.

The article demonstrates that the system modernization in the considered period and the search for rational project work solutions is being performed in a complex and consistent manner with the spacecraft parameters assessment as well as parameters of the spacecraft subsystems being replaced. This complex studies allow accounting for the functional relationships (both internal and external) dynamics, and determining rational solution on the term extension of the ERS SC effective application at the restricted costs.

The developed technique allows performing technical-and-economic analysis of the ERS SC modernization program alternative options and obtaining necessary quantitative assessments while project solutions of the spacecraft modifications assessment and selection, as well as assessing the unified space platforms application effectiveness and enhancing the operational life of subsystems and a spacecraft as a whole. The developed technique may be applied for the ERS SC development programs correction and determining requirements to the prospective spacecraft and its modifications.

Keywords:

comprehensive assessment of parameters and of the Program for Remote Earth Probing Spacecraft Development, algorithm for estimating rational parameters, coordinated multilevel search for rational parameters

References

  1. Baklanov A.I. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo aerokosmicheskogo universiteta, 2010, no. 2(22), pp. 80–91.
  2. Astashkin A.A., Karelin A.V., Kuz’min Yu.A. et al. Voprosy elektromekhaniki. Trudy VNIIEM, 2018, vol. 165, no. 4, pp. 9–19.
  3. Grishin A.V., Dedus F.F., Istomina M.I. et al. Kosmonavtika i raketostroenie, 2015, no. 6 (85), pp. 5–10.
  4. Astashkin A.A., Karelin A.V., Komissarova I.N. et al. Kosmonavtika i raketostroenie, 2015, no. 6 (85), pp. 5–10.
  5. Baklanov A.I. Raketno-kosmicheskoe priborostroenie i informatsionnye sistemy, 2018, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 17–28. DOI: 10.30894/issn2409-0239.2018.5.3.17.28
  6. Baklanov A.I. Raketno-kosmicheskoe priborostroenie i informatsionnye sistemy, 2018, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 14–27. DOI: 10.30894/issn2409-0239.2018.5.4.14.27
  7. Arkhipov S.A. Informatsiya i Kosmos, 2016, no. 3, pp. 153–160.
  8. Zhang J., Yan J., Ma Y., Xu D., Li P., Jie W. Infrastructures and services for remote sensing data production management across multiple satellite data centers. Cluster Computing, 2016, vol. 19, pp. 1243-1260. DOI: 0.1007/s10586-016-0577-6
  9. Chi M., Plaza A., Benediktsson J.A., Sun Z., Shen J., Zhu Y. Big data for remote sensing: challenges and opportunities. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2016, vol. 104, no. 11, pp. 2207–2219. DOI: 10.1109/jproc. 2016. 2598228
  10. Chen L., Ma Y., Liu P., Wei J., Jie W., He J. A review of parallel computing for large-scale remote sensing image mosaicking. Cluster Computing, 2015, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 517–529. DOI: 10.1007/s10586-015-0422-3
  11. Arnaud M., Boissin B., Perret L., Boussarie E., Gleyzes A. The Pléiades High Resolution Program. 57th International Astronautical Congress IAC/IAF/IAA (2-6 October 2006; Valencia, Spain). DOI: 10.2514/ 6.IAC-06-B1.1.04
  12. Gleyzes A., Perret L. Pleiades high resolution optical Earth Observation system status and future missions preparation in the frame of CXCI CNES program. 64th International Astronautical Congress (23–27 September 2013; Beijing, China). IAC-13,B1, 2,2,x16915.brief.pdf
  13. Ming L. Remote sensing satellite planning in Chinese National Space infrastructure for next eight years. 68th International Astronautical Congress (25–29 September 2017; Adelaide, Australia). IAC-13-B1.2.1.
  14. Abdurakhimov A.A., Balandin V.N., Levandovich A.V. Informatsiya i Kosmos, 2016, no. 3, pp. 153–160.
  15. Pirogova A.M., Priklonskii V.I., Fedotov A.P. et al. Kosmonavtika i raketostroenie, 2015, no. 6(85), pp. 101–105.
  16. Stratilatova N.N., Kurenkov V.I., Kucherov A.S. et al. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo aerokos-micheskogo universiteta, 2016, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 80–89. DOI: 10.18287/2412-7329-2016-15-2-80-89
  17. Pirogova A.M., Priklonskii V.I., Chernenko E.N. et al. Kosmonavtika i raketostroenie, 2014, no. 5(78), pp. 37–42.
  18. Borisov A.V., Emel’yanov A.A., Silin B.G. Kosmonavtika i raketostroenie, 2015, no. 6(85), pp. 92–100.
  19. Kovalevskii N.P., Tomshina T.V. Kosmonavtika i raketostroenie, 2015, no. 6(85), pp. 20–25.
  20. Bazhanov B.L., Krylov O.A. Kosmona vtika i raketostroenie, 2015, no. 6(85), pp. 77–80.
  21. Matveev Y.A., Lamzin V.V. Optimization of parameters of earth remote sensing space system taking into account the features of spacecraft designer decisions. Aerospace MAI Journal, 2009, vol. 16, no. 6, pp. 55-66.
  22. Shevchenko S.N. Vestnik NPO im. S.A. Lavochkina, 2020, no. 1(47), pp. 24–28.
  23. Zolotoi S.A. Vestnik NPO im. S.A. Lavochkina, 2017, no. 1(35), pp. 83–86.
  24. Matveev Yu.A., Lamzin V.A, Lamzin V.V. Osnovy proektirovaniya modifikatsii kosmicheskikh apparatov distantsionnogo zondirovaniya Zemli (Design Basis of Remote Earth Probing Spacecraft Modifications), Moscow, MAI, 2015, 176 p.
  25. Zanin K.A., Moskatin’ev I.V. Vestnik NPO im. S.A. Lavochkina, 2019, no. 2(44), pp. 28–36. DOI: 10.26162/LS.2019.44.2.003
  26. Brender M. GeoEye-1 The Next-Generation Imagery. GIS DEVELOPMENT, 2007, vol. 11, no. 7, pp. 58–59.
  27. Herring Ch. At the Tipping Point. How Digitale Globe‘s Latest Satellite Launch is Breaking Down Barriers. Imaging Notes, 2010, vol. 25, no. 1, www.imagingnotes.com
  28. Cook M.K., Peterson B.A., Dial G., Gibson L., Gerlach F.W., Hutchins K.S., Kudola R., Bowen H.S. IKONOS technical performance assessment. Proceedings SPIE, 2001, vol. 4381. DOI: 10.1117/ 12.436997
  29. Lamzin V.A., Lamzin V.V. Method for characteristics predicting of prospective earth probing spacecraft with optoelectronic imaging hafdware. Aerospace MAI Journal, 2021, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 95-112. DOI: 10.34759/vst-2021-2-95-112
  30. Baklanov A.I., Blinov V.D., Gorbunov I.A. et al. Vestnik Samarskogo gosudarstvennogo aerokos-micheskogo universiteta imeni akademika S.P. Koroleva (natsional’nogo issledovatel’skogo universiteta), 2016, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 30–35. DOI: 10.18287/2412-7329-2016-15-2-30-35
  31. Lamzin V.V. A performance investigation for optical-electronic Earth remote sensing system during planned upgrade. Aerospace MAI Journal, 2009, vol. 16, no. 5, pp. 46-55.
  32. Sevast’yanov N.N., Branets V.N., Panchenko V.A. et al. Trudy MFTI, 2009, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 15–23.
  33. Gorelov V.A., Lukashevich E.L., Strel’tsov V.A. Informatsionnyi byulleten’ GIS-Assotsiatsii, 2002, no. 4, 5, 2003, no. 1, 2.
  34. Fortescue P., Swinerd G., Stark J. Spacecraft Systems Engineering. 4th Ed. Wiley, 2011, 728 p.
  35. Costes V., Cassar G., Escarrat L., Conseil S. Optical design of a compact telescope for the next generation Earth observation system. International Conference on Space Optics — ICSO 2012 (20 November 2017; Ajaccio-Corsica, France). DOI: 10.1117/12/2309055

mai.ru — informational site of MAI

Copyright © 1994-2024 by MAI