Experimental Studies of Vortex Generators on the Wing Leading Edge

Aeronautical and Space-Rocket Engineering


Аuthors

Volobuev R. A.*, Galkin M. Y.**, Kuznetsov A. V.***, A. , Slitinskaya A. Y.****

Moscow Aviation Institute (National Research University), 4, Volokolamskoe shosse, Moscow, А-80, GSP-3, 125993, Russia

*e-mail: haruogawa.05@gmail.com
**e-mail: o9366891.953@gmail.com
***e-mail: alexkuzn@gmail.ru
****e-mail: flinas@yandex.ru

Abstract

Presently, various kinds of vortex generators are being actively employed on many aerial vehicles. Vortex generators create a vortex that interacts with both boundary layer and external airflow, mixing them and reducing thereby the height of the boundary layer. Vortex generators application refers to passive methods of the flow control. Vortex generators are being placed on the aircraft wings for the boundary layer separation protracting or preventing, flow-around improving at high angles of attack, and increasing maximum lift and critical angle of attack, as well as preventing harmful interference of the various aircraft structure parts.
The presented research work novelty lies in considering a new type of vortex generators (crescent-shaped vortex generators placed on the wing leading edge) and obtaining characteristics of their effectiveness with several different models. Experimental studies of the efficiency of vortex generators were conducted with eight models in the T-1 MAI Wind Tunnel. These are three wing compartments with various profiles, such as ND4, GA(W-1), GA(W-2); three wing compartments with the same profiles and crescent-shaped vortex generators installed on their leading edge. There was also one wing compartment with the ND4 profile with “classic” trapezoidal vortex generators mounted on the wing upper surface of the at 10% of its chord, as well as one aircraft model with a swept-back wing with the bolt-on vortex generators. 
In the course of the tests, the flow-around was being visualized by three methods, such as the mulberry method, the oiled dots method, and the oiled film method. The article demonstrates the necessity of accounting for the tufts effect on both flow-around and aerodynamic properties of the experimental model under study.
The visualization results demonstrate that the separation retard with the vortex generator installing. At the zero angle of attack, vortex tracks can be observed behind the “classic” vortex generators , which leads to the stronger increase in the drag coefficient during continuous flow-around and, as a result, to the decrease in maximum aerodynamic quality. At the same time, at high near-critical angles of attack, the separation area is much smaller, which leads to the significant increase in the maximum lift coefficient. The crescent-shaped vortex generators application on the wing leading edge at low angles of attack practically does not change the flow-pattern, however, it somewhat irons out the tear-off area development at the near-critical angles of attack. This effect affects beneficially on the piloting safety at low speeds and high angles of attack.
Application of the “classic” trapezoidal vortex generators placed on the wing upper surface led to a greater increase in the maximum lift coefficient than the installation of crescent-shaped ones placed on the wing leading edge of the, on the wing compartment with the ND4 profile at V = 48 m/s and Re = 1.24 · 106.
For the wing compartment with the GA(W-1) and GA(W-2) profiles, the efficiency of the crescent vortex generator on the wing leading edge is higher than on the wing compartment with the ND4 profile.
The section of local lift sliding at the intermediate angles of attack was eliminated by the crescent-shaped vortex generators placed on the wing leading edge of the training aircraft.

Keywords:

experimental studies of the vortex generators efficiency, of flow separation control passive methods, wing aerodynamic characteristics

References

  1.  Ghoddoussi A, Miller LS. A Conceptual Study of Airfoil Performance Enhancements Using CFD. AIAA Atmospheric Flight Mechanics Conference (August 13-16, 2012; Minneapolis, Minnesota). DOI: 10.2514/6.2012-4655
  2.  Konig J, Hansen H, Coustols E, et al. New technologies in low speed aerodynamics wind tunnel and flight test demonstrated in AWIATOR. European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering (ECCOMAS’2004; July24–28, 2004; Jyvaskyla). p. 953.
  3.  Bragin NN, Gubanova MA, Kurilov VB, et al. Experimental studies of the effect of small-sized elements on the aerodynamic characteristics of a passenger aircraft in take-off and landing flight modes. Materialy XXV Nauchno-tekhnicheskoi konferentsii po aerodinamike (February 27-28, 2014; p. Volodarskogo). Zhukovsky: TsAGI; 2014. p. 72-73. (In Russ.).
  4.  Pearcey HH. Introduction to shock-induced separation and its prevention by design and boundary layer control. In: Lachmann G. (ed) Boundary layer and flow control. Its Principles and Application. Pergamon Press, Oxford; 1961. Vol. 2. p. 1166-1344. DOI: 10.1016/B978-1-4832-1323-1.50021-X
  5.  Artamonova LG, Belov IA, Mamchur VI, et al. Numerical and physical modeling of turbulent flow around a plate with transverse ribs. Inzhenerno-fizicheskii zhurnal. 1987;52(1):43-51. (In Russ.).
  6.  Pauley W, Eaton J. Experimental study of the development of longitudinal vortex pairs embedded in a turbulent boundary layer. AIAA Journal. 1988;26(7):816-823. DOI: 10.2514/3.9974
  7.  Pavlenko AM, Zanin BY, Katasonov MM, et al. Transformation of the tear-off flow structure by local action. Teplofizika i aeromekhanika 2010;17(1):17-22.
  8.  Baghdadi MK. Numerical Studies of interference of vortex generator and a wing with air propeller. Aerospace MAI Journal. 2025;32(2):27-35. (In Russ.). URL: https://vestnikmai.ru/eng/publications.php?ID=184988
  9.  Baghdadi MK, Pavlenko OV, Razdobarin АМ. Numerical studies improve of flow around a wing with a pulling airscrew. Technical Physics. 2024;69(12):1939–1942. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.61011/TP.2024.12.60427.334-24
  10.  Godard G, Stanislas M. Control of a decelerating boundary layer. Part. 1: Optimization of passive vortex generators. Aerospace Science and Technology. 2006;10(3):181-191. DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2005.11.007
  11.  Abramova KA, Pavlenko OV, Petrov AV, et al. Numerical simulation of aerodynamic performance of high-lift wing airfoil with flow control at cruise, take-off and landing flight regimes. Uchenye zapiski TsAGI. 2024;55(3):27-41. (In Russ.).
  12.  Brutyan MA, Wolkov AV, Vyshinsky VV. Modification of the shape of the vortex generator to increase its efficiency. Uchenye zapiski TsAGI. 2023;54(1):20-27. (In Russ.).
  13.  Karyakin OM, Sakharova AI, Slitinskaya AY, et al. Investigation of passive vortex generators on straight and swept wings. Materialy XVII Mezhdunarodnoi shkoly-seminara “Modeli i metody aerodinamiki: sbornik “ (June 04–11, 2017; Evpatoria). p. 80. (In Russ.).
  14.  Nalivaiko AG, Urusov AY, Uspenskii AA, et al. Experimental studies of wing lift control using actuators distributed over its surface. Uchenye zapiski TsAGI. 2017;48(1):37–52. (In Russ.).
  15.  Nizov SN. Aerohydrodynamic surface, group of vortex generators and method of installation of the group of vortex generators. Patent RU 2749524 C1, 11.06.2021. (In Russ.).
  16.  Kharitonov AM. Technique and methods of the aerophysical experiment. 2nd ed. Novosibirsk: NGTU; 2016. 644 p. (In Russ.).
  17.  Ustimenko MV. Investigation of the effect of silkworms on the aerodynamic characteristics and flow spectra of a straight wing model with a NACA0018 profile in a MAI T-1 wind tunne. Materialy XLVIII Mezhdunarodnoi molodezhnoi nauchnoi konferentsii “Gagarinskie chteniya – 2022” (April 12-15, 2022; Moscow). Moscow: Pero; 2022. p. 16-17. (In Russ.).
  18.  Volobuev RA, Galkin MY, Kuznetsov AV, et al. Experimental studies of the passive method of flow tightening on the wing compartment in the T-1 MAI ADT. Materialy XXXIII Nauchno-tekhnicheskoi konferentsii po aerodinamike (December 15-16, 2022; Zhukovsky). Zhukovsky: TsAGI; 2022. p. 44. (In Russ.).
  19.  Zanin BY, Kozlov VV. Vortex structures in subsonic separation currents. Novosibirsk: NGU; 2011. 116 p. (In Russ.).
  20.  Matyushenko AA, Garbaruk AV. Numerical study of influence of three-dimensional mushroom-like cells on airfoil characteristics. Теплоvye protsessy v tekhnike. 2016;8(1):31-35. (In Russ.).
  21.  Brylyakov AP, Zharkova GM, Zanin BY, et al. Flow separation on a straight wing with increased external turbulence. Uchenye zapiski TsAGI. 2004;35(1-2):57-62. (In Russ.).

mai.ru — informational site of MAI

Copyright © 1994-2025 by MAI