Predicting Loads Affecting Load-Bearing Elements of Cargo-Landing Means While Parachute System Bringing into Action

Aeronautical and Space-Rocket Engineering


Аuthors

Averyanov I. O.

Moscow design industrial complex "MKPK "Universal", 79A, Altufevskoe shosse, Moscow, 127410, Russia

e-mail: i.averyanov@mail.ru

Abstract

Heavy cargoes parachute landing is being accomplished as a rule by the cascade multi-canopy parachute systems application (CMPS). Cargo landing systems (CLS) are intended for the safety ensuring of the landing process at all of its stages, i.e. from the cargo exiting from the aircraft fuselage to its straightforwardly landing on the site. The process of the parachute system (PS) bringing into action is the most dangerous from the viewpoint of the PS and CLS structural elements loading. The presented article deals with the problem of the CLS design loads determining in the process of the PS binging into action and forming corresponding computational case of loading. The PS in it was being presented as a one canopy of the main parachute connected with pilot chute by the sling. The presented work extends the MM [1-2] application area with regard to the CMPS functioning considering at the stage of its bringing into action for the CLS loading problem solving at the specified operating mode. For this purpose the following changes are introduced into the MM:
1 – a movable site, imitating the aircraft cargo floor, was realized to simulate the process of the cargo exiting from the aircraft fuselage;
2 – operation of the PS and CLS constituent parts was realized for adequacy ensuring of cargo exiting dynamic process;
3 – the cascade principle for the multiple canopy PS is realized.
To confirm the proposed method workability, a problem of loadings on the suspending system structural elements, namely wire-rope system, which is a part of the PS and intended for the cargo strapping to the CLS is being considered. For this purpose, a process of the PS with CMPS landing is being considered. The MM parameters identification is being performed at the first stage by the computational and experimental data comparing. The performed analysis revealed their good agreement in the process of the PS bringing into action, including the one with regard to the suspending system loading. A technique for the computational loading case, corresponding to the mode being considered for the suspending system elements structure is being presented at the second stage. By the results of the conducted study an inference may be drawn on the fidelity of computational characteristics being obtained by the developed method, which do not contradict with the experimental data, and may be employed for the computational cases of the CLS loading at the stage of the PS bringing into action.

Keywords:

cargo-landing system, cascade multiple canopy parachute system, landing process

References

  1. Averyanov IO. Mathematical model of non-deformed cargo parachute landing system with dampers on rigid plane in case of stationary wind field. Trudy MAI. 2023(131). (In Russ.). URL: http://trudymai.ru/eng/published.php?ID=175907
  2.  Averyanov IO. Cascade parachute system with stiff round canopies mathematical model in the task of parachute-cargo system ballistic characteristics evaluation. Trudy MAI. 2024(138). (In Russ.). URL: https://trudymai.ru/eng/published.php?ID=182678
  3.  Lyalin VV, Morozov VI, Ponomarev AT. Parachute systems. Problems and methods of their solution. Moscow: Fizmatlit; 2009. 576 p. (In Russ.). 
  4.  Rysev OV, Vishnyak AA, Churkin VM., et al. Dynamics of connected bodies in the problems of movement of parachute systems. Moscow: Mashinostroenie; 1992. 288 p. (In Russ.).
  5.  Antonenko AI, Rysev OV, Fatykhov FF, et al. Dynamics of movement of parachute systems. Moscow: Mashinostroenie; 1982. 152 p. (In Russ.).
  6.  Churkin VM. Program module approximate research deployment parachute canopy. Trudy MAI. 2011(49). (In Russ.). URL: https://trudymai.ru/eng/published.php?ID=27969
  7.  Aparinov VA, Zaichuk RM, Ponomarev AT. Modeling parachute loading taking into account dome deformation. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Mekhanika tverdogo tela. 2003(3):155-172. (In Russ.).
  8.  Leonov SV, Morozov VI, Ponomarev AT. Modeling of formation and strength characteristics of parachutes. Izvestiya Rossiiskoi akademii nauk. Mekhanika tverdogo tela. 2011(2):183–198. (In Russ.). 
  9.  Bugrimov A, Wasilchenko A, Leonov S. Methods of engineering calculation and mathematical modelling of work of parachutes. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo oblastnogo universiteta. Seriya: Fizika–matematika. 2011(3):90-96. (In Russ.).
  10.  Tryamkin AV, Skidanov SN. Research on parachute systems filling process. Trudy MAI. 2001(3). (In Russ.). URL: https://trudymai.ru/eng/published.php?ID=34686
  11.  Ivanov PI. Research of parachute systems and paragliding aircraft. Feodosia: Jason; 2022. 736 p. (In Russ.).
  12.  Ivanov PI, Kurinnyi SM, Krivorotov MM. Parameters liable to be defined while a multi-dome parachute system flight-testing for its efficiency estimation. Aerospace MAI Journal. 2020;27(3):49-59. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.34759/vst-2020-3-49-59
  13.  Ivanov PI., Berislavskii NY. Problematic issues of functioning of multi-dome parachute systems. Aerospace MAI Journal. 2020;27(1):43-52. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.34759/vst-2020-1-43-52
  14.  Ivanov PI, Krivorotov MM, Kurinnyi SM. Experiment informativity in flight tests of parachute systems. Decision making. Aerospace MAI Journal. 2021;28(1):126-136. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.34759/vst-2021-1-126-136
  15.  Tutt BA. Fluid Structure Interaction Parachute Benchmark Models in LS-DYNA. AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems (ADS) Conference (March 25-28, 2013; Daytona Beach, Florida). DOI: 10.2514/6.2013-1384
  16.  Kim Y, Peskin CS. 3D Parachute simulation by the immersed boundary method. Computers & Fluids. 2009;38(6):1080-1090. DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2008.11.002
  17.  Stein K, Tezduyar TE, Sathe S, et al. Fluid-structure interaction modeling of parachute soft-landing dynamics. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Fluids. 2004;47(6-7):619 – 631. DOI: 10.1002/fld.835
  18.  Stein KR, Tezduyar TE, Kumar V, et al. Charles. Numerical simulation of soft landing for clusters of cargo parachutes. European Congress on Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering (July 24-28, 2004; Jyvaskyla, Finland).
  19.  Averyanov IO, Zinin AV. Mathematical model of non-deformed cargo landing system with dampers to rigid plane landing process. Trudy MAI. 2022(124). (In Russ.). URL: https://trudymai.ru/eng/published.php?ID=34686
  20.  Zhurin SV, Leonov SV, Mekhonoshin YuG. Processing and analysis of fligh experiment data for determining the characteristics of the motion of a round parachute on a spiral trajectory at high altitudes. Civil Aviation High Technologies. 2015(211):71-78. (In Russ.)
  21.  Sobol' IM. The Monte Carlo method. Moscow: Nauka; 1968. 64 p. (Popular lectures on mathematics. Issue 46). (In Russ.).

mai.ru — informational site of MAI

Copyright © 1994-2025 by MAI