«Teleportation» of a magnetic disturbance in the superconducting slot line

Applied Mathematics, Mechanics and Physics


Аuthors

Zherikhina L. N.1*, Karuzskii A. L.1**, Perestoronin A. V.1***, Tskhovrebov A. M.1****, Yarman T. 2

1. Leading Engineer of the Astrospace Center S.A. Lebedeva, 53, Leninskii av., Moscow, 119991, Russia
2. Okan University, Akfirat-Tuzla, Istanbul, 34959, Turkey

*e-mail: zherikh@sci.lebedev.ru
**e-mail: karuz@sci.lebedev.ru
***e-mail: anatoly@sci.lebedev.ru
****e-mail: tshovrebov@yandex.ru

Abstract

The principal points considered in the article are focused around various aspects examining cause and effect restrictions of relativistic and quantum-mechanical origin on the transmission speed and the treatment of discrete information. In the introduction different approaches to Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox and its actual generalization like effects, described by Bells inequalities, and also certain aspects of the problem history are demonstrated. Main content is devoted to features of a signal propagation in the closed slot microwave transmission line, metallic components of which are in the superconducting state. In case of coapplication of the classical model of the field screening in a superconductor and magnetic flux quantization in a closed superconducting circuit certain ascendant imperfection of the «usual» fluxon theory, connected with some contradictions, is demonstrated. Correlation of quantum fluctuations and propagation feature of pulsed magnetic disturbances in a closed extended superconducting circuit are analyzed in the context of Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox. From presented evaluations it follows that the process of signal reception at the end of the superconducting slotted line with conservation of quantum coherence is possible under corresponding selection of detector parameters, such as SQUID. On the whole the performed consideration shows us that the macroscopic quantum phenomena constitutes not less abundant list of effects, than traditionally reviewed schemes of EPR paradox realizations, based on microsystems in the form of photon pairs, which are born in the entangled states. In the conclusive part the possible schemes of an experimental study of postfactum influence effects are considered, when the effects of influence on interference in a single macroquantum system from classical positions may be interpreted as the posteriori sequence of consequence-cause. «The post factum action» is realized as an impulse disturbance of the optical path length, introduced into one of shoulders of Mach — Zander interferometer. For «experimental facilitation» of the task in both shoulders of set-up optic delay on the basis of photon crystals, which is providing time lag, corresponding to the light propagation per cents of kilometers, are introduced.

Keywords:

quantum mechanics, nonlocality, superconductivity, magnetic disturbances

References

  1. Kilin S.Ya. Uspekhi fizicheskikh nauk, 1999, vol. 169, no.5, pp. 507-527.
  2. Dzhemmer M. Evolyutsiya ponyatii kvantovoi mekhaniki (The evolution of the concepts of quantum mechanics), Moscow, Nauka, 1985, 384 p.
  3. Matsukevich D.N., Maunz P., Moehring D.L., Olmschenk S. and Monroe C. Bell Inequality Violation with Two Remote Atomic Qubits, Physical Review Letters, 2008, vol. 100, no. 15, p. 150404.
  4. Nielsen M.A., Knill E., Laflamme R. Complete quantum teleportation using nuclear magnetic resonance, Nature, 1998, vol. 396, pp. 52-55.
  5. Leggett A.J. Uspekhi fizicheskikh nauk, 1986, vol.148, pp. 671-688.
  6. Spasskii B.I., Moskovskii A.V. Uspekhi fizicheskikh nauk, 1984, vol. 142, no. 4, pp. 599-617.
  7. Fгeedman S.J., Сlauser J.F. Experimental Test of Local Hidden-Variable Theories, Physical Review Letters, 1972, vol. 28, pp. 938-941.
  8. Vavilov S.I. Uspekhi fizicheskikh nauk, 1948, vol. 36, no. 11, pp. 247-283.
  9. Scheidl T., Ursin R., Kofler J., Ramelow S., Ma X., Herbst T., Ratschbacher L., Fedrizzi A., Langford N. K., Jennewein T., Zeilinger A. Violation of local realism with freedom of choice, PNAS, 2010, vol. 107, no. 46, pp. 19708 - 19713.
  10. Everett H. «Relative State» Formulation of Quantum Mechanics, Reviews of Modern Physics, 1957, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 454-462.
  11. DeWitt B.S. Quantum Mechanics and Reality, Physics Today, 1970, vol. 23, no. 9, pp. 30-35.
  12. Albert D.Z. On quantum-mechanical automata, Physics Letters, 1983, vol. 98, pp. 249-252.
  13. Deutsch D. Quantum Theory, the Church-Turing Principle and the Universal Quantum Computer, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 1985, vol. 400, pp. 97-117.
  14. Vaidman L. Teleportation of quantum states, Physical Review, 1994, vol. 49, pp. 1473-1476.
  15. Braunstein L.S., Kimble H.J.Teleportation of Continuous Quantum Variables, Physical Review Letters, 1998, vol. 80, pp. 869-872.
  16. Van Loock P., Braunstein S.L., Kimble H.J. Broad band teleportation, Physical Review, 2000, vol. 62, p. 022309.
  17. Grigorev A.D. Elektrodinamika i tekhnika SVCh (Electrodynamics and high frequency technique), Moscow, Vysshaya shkola, 1990, 335 p.
  18. Langer J.S. Coherent States in the Theory of Superfluidity, Physical Review, 1967, vol. 167, p. 183.
  19. Khoenberg P. Uspekhi fizicheskikh nauk, 1970, vol. 102, no. 2, pp. 239.
  20. Meiβnerand W., Ochsenfeld R. Ein neuer Effekt bei Eintritt der Supraleitfahigkei, Naturwissenschaften, 1933, vol. 21, pp. 787-788.
  21. London F. and London H. The Electromagnetic Equations of the Supraconductor, Proceedings of the Royal Society, 1935, vol. 149, pp. 71-88.
  22. Logunov A.A., Mestvirishvili M.A. Relyativistskaya teoriya gravitatsii (Relativistic theory of gravitation), Moscow, Nauka, 1989, 304 p.
  23. Feinman R. Statisticheskaya mekhanika (Statistical mechanics), Moscow, Mir, 1975, 408 p.
  24. Raider L. Kvantovaya teoriya polya (Quantum field theory), Volgograd, Platon, 1998, 512p.
  25. Deaver B.S.Jr., Fairbank W.M. Experimental evidence for quantized flux in superconducting cylinders, Physical Review Letters, 1961, vol. 7, pp. 43-46.
  26. Doll R., Nabauer M. Experimental proof of magnetic flux quantization in a superconducting ring, Physical Review Letters, 1961, vol. 7, pp. 51-52.
  27. Golovashkin A.I., Zherikhina L.N., Tskhovrebov A.M., Izmailov G.N., Ozolin V.V. Zhurnal Eksperimentalnoi i Teoreticheskoi Fiziki, 2010, vol. 138, no. 2, pp. 373-380.
  28. Wissner-Gross A.D., Freer C. E. Relativistic statistical arbitrage, Physical Review, 2010, vol. 82, p. 056104.
  29. Kholmetskii A.L., Yarman T. The semi-classical limit of the Aharonov-Bohm effect: The actualized approach, European Physical Journal Plus, 2013, vol. 128, p. 30.
  30. Izmailov G.N., Nikolaev F.A., Dubrov M.N., Aleshin V.A., Parakhin V.E. Zhurnal Tekhnicheskoi Fiziki, 1987, no. 6, pp.1194-1196.
  31. Gorelik V.S. Optics of Globular Photonic Crystals, Laser Physics, 2008, vol.18, no. 12, pp. 1479-1500.

mai.ru — informational site of MAI

Copyright © 1994-2024 by MAI