Experimental methods for determining dynamic characteristics of aircraft landing gear

Aeronautical and Space-Rocket Engineering

Strength and thermal conditions of flying vehicles


DOI: 10.34759/vst-2019-4-66-80

Аuthors

Kolyshev E. S.*, Krapivko A. V.**

Central Aerohydrodynamic Institute named after N.E. Zhukovsky (TsAGI), 1, Zhukovsky str., Zhukovsky, Moscow Region, 140180, Russia

*e-mail: eskolyshev@gmail.com
**e-mail: a_krapivko@tsagi.ru

Abstract

The article describes methods and algorithms for determining the fundamental eigen modes of landing gear, such as torsion, lateral and longitudinal bending of support, according to the amplitude-phase frequency characteristics measured at characteristic points of the structure. Resonant frequencies, shapes and decrements of vibrations are determined using transfer functions (dynamic compliance and dynamic stiffness). A typical accelerometers arrangement of a system for oscillations registering and arrangement of vibration exciters are given. The described methods for obtaining dynamic characteristics were developed based on the long experience in landing gears GVT of various aircraft.

The novelty in landing gear GVT is marked:

  1. Moveable carriages with vibration exciter mounted on them, which are equipped with special connecting devices for attaching rods to the axis of wheels. The rods are equipped with forces sensors transmitted to the structure, in order to eliminate the excitation system effect.

  2. The GVT is performed for the landing gear both in a free state and at various vertical loads on supports created from action of the aircraft mass by hydraulic lifts.

  3. The applied shock method application on landing gear to obtain amplitude-phase frequency characteristics at the selected points of structure according to the results of response functions processing. This method allows giving an operational evaluation of the landing gear resonant characteristics and speed up the ground frequency testing procedure.

  4. The GVT results processing is performed using transfer functions of dynamic compliance and dynamic stiffness of landing gear strut for bending and torsion and their cross links.

  5. To determine hydraulic lifts effect on landing gear dynamic characteristics, the GVT in a free state is performed in cases when the aircraft is installed on the standard hydraulic lifts and when the aircraft is installed on pneumatic supports.

Keywords:

landing gear, shimmy, resonance characteristics, ground vibration testing, frequency response characteristics, transfer functions

References

  1. Krüger W., Besselink I., Cowling D., Doan D.B., Kortüm W., Krabacher W., Aircraft landing gear dynamics: simulation and control. Vehicle System Dynamic, 1997, vol. 28, no. 2-3, pp. 119-158. DOI: 10.1080/00423119708969352

  2. Krapivko A.V. Trudy TSAGI, Moscow, Publishing Department of TSAGI, 2013, vol. 2727, 200 p.

  3. Krapivko A.V., Zadonskay V.N., Kolyshev E.S., Paryshev S.E., Dubovsky E.A. Experimental methods of studying of dynamic characteristics of airplane landing gear. International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics (IFASD 2015) (Saint Petersburg, Russia 28 June – 2 July 2015). NY, Curran Associates Inc., 2016, pp. 1263-1283.

  4. Krapivko A.V., Zadonskay V.N., Kolyshev E.S., Paryshev S.E., Dubovsky E.A. Experimental methods of studying of dynamic characteristics of airplane landing gear. International Forum on Aeroelasticity and Structural Dynamics (IFASD 2015) (Saint Petersburg, Russia 28 June – 2 July 2015). NY: Curran Associates Inc., 2016, pp. 1263-1283.

  5. Karkle P.G., Malyutin V.A., Mamedov O.S., Popovskii V.N., Smotrov A.V., Smyslov V.I. Trudy TsAGI, Moscow, Izdatel’skii otdel TsAGI, 2012, no. 2708, 35 p.

  6. Zharov E.A., Smyslov V.I. Trudy TsAGI, Moscow, Izdatel’skii otdel TsAGI, 1984, no. 2219, pp. 60-74.

  7. Smyslov V.I. Uchenye zapiski TsAGI, 1972, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 110-118.

  8. Pronin M.A., Ryabykina R.V., Smyslov V.I. Experimental study of the aircraft forced vibrations while the engine blade break-away. Aerospace MAI Journal, 2019, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 51-60.

  9. Försching H.W. Grundlagen derAeroelastik. Berlin etc., 1974, 693 p.

  10. Aviatsionnye pravila. Chast’ 25. Normy letnoi godnosti samoletov transportnoi kategorii (Aviation regulations. Part 25. Airworthiness standards of transport category aircraft), Moscow, Letno-issledovatel’skii institut im. M.M. Gromova, 1994, 321 p.

  11. Mikishev G.N., Rabinovich B.I. Dinamika tonkostennykh konstruktsii s otsekami, soderzhashchimi zhidkost’ (Dynamics of thin-walled structures with compartments containing liquid), Moscow, Mashinostroenie, 1971, 563 p.

  12. Smyslov V. I. Trudy TsAGI, Moscow, Izdatel’skii otdel TsAGI, 2013, no. 2738, pp. 245-255.

  13. Bokser V.D. et al. TsAGI – osnovnye etapy nauchnoi deyatel’nosti, 1968-1993 (TSAGI-the main stages of scientific activity, 1968-1993), Moscow, Fizmatlit, 1996, 574 p.

  14. Chelomei V.N. Vibratsii v tekhnike: Spravochnik. T. 5. Izmereniya i ispytaniya (Vibrations in technology: Handbook. Vol. 5. Measurements and tests). Moscow, Mashinostroenie, 1981, pp. 330-348.

  15. Heilen V., Lammens S., Sas P. Modal’nyi analiz: teoriya i ispytaniya (Modal analysis: theory and tests), Moscow, Novatest, 2010, 319 p.

  16. Randall R. Frequency Analysis. Brüel & Kjær, 1987, 344 p.

  17. Semenova A.S., Zubko A.I. Studying technical condition of the interrotor bearing with the SP180-M vibratory-diagnostic test bench after passing life tests. Aerospace MAI Journal, 2019, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 126-138.

  18. Zichenkov M.C., Ishmuratov F.Z., Kuznetsov A.G. Studying the gyroscopic forces and structural damping joint impact on the wing flutter of the aeroelastic euram model. Aerospace MAI Journal, 2018, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 86-95.

  19. Grachev N.N. Stability provision of electromechanical transducer characteristics in conditions of flight in the upper atmosphere. Aerospace MAI Journal, 2018, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 207-215.

  20. Tereshkin V.M. Theoretical justification of the possibility of reducing vibrations of electromagnetic origin in a five-phase alternating current machine in comparison with a three-phase machine. Aerospace MAI Journal, 2018, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 229-239.

  21. Khmelnitskii Ya.A., Salina M.S., Kataev Yu.A. Spacecraft solar batteries dynamic analysis. Aerospace MAI Journal, 2018, vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 52-60.

mai.ru — informational site of MAI

Copyright © 1994-2024 by MAI